How did a woman prove she had a verbal agreement to share a million-dollar Mega-Sena prize with her ex? The woman who managed to prove in court a verbal agreement she made with her ex-partner to share lottery prizes was working as a cleaner when she discovered she was part of a winning prize pool. It was the boss's then husband who told her, according to a witness' report, which appears in the file. The total value of the jackpot prize was R$117.5 million, divided between 42 shares. The former couple was entitled to a share, worth R$2,788,982.62. The state Court of Justice (TJSC) ordered the man to pay R$1,294,491.32 to his ex, which was the amount requested by her in the initial action. g1 contacted the defendant's lawyers and had not received a response until the last update of this report. ?Click and follow the g1 SC channel on WhatsApp How a woman proved to have a verbal agreement to share a million-dollar prize According to the witness, the boss's then-husband was the one who said that a prize from the Velha lottery, in Blumenau, in Vale do Itajaí, had been drawn. According to the statement, the cleaning lady said she had given money to bet on that game. The husband even said to the worker: "You're a millionaire, put down the broom". The witness also reported that he then heard the conversation between the cleaning lady and his then partner about the prize. The deponent said that the defendant initially declared that the draw did not exist. Afterwards, he admitted it, but said that the value of the prize was R$300,000. The prize pool was drawn on May 31, 2022, in contest number 2,486 of the Mega-Sena. The woman who filed the lawsuit reported that she placed bets with her then partner and that she had a verbal agreement with him that they would share the prizes they won. The two had been in a relationship for about three years. According to the process, however, the man started to distance himself after winning the prize. How was joint betting proven? To prove this in court, she showed conversations on a messaging app she had with her ex and filed a police report. Witness statements, such as the person who saw the woman's reaction to the draw result, were also used. In his vote, the reporting judge, Mauro Ferradin, cited one of the pieces of evidence presented by the woman's defense: a conversation via messaging app in which she charged the man for part of the prize. In this case, he does not deny that he made the joint bet, but asks for "calm down". Messaging application conversation used as proof of Mega-Sena prize division process in Blumenau, SC Reproduction Finally, another factor taken into consideration by the judge was the fact that the defendant gave the woman an amount of R$200,000 and an apartment. For the reporting judge, this attitude of the defendant reinforces the thesis that they had a verbal agreement when placing the bets. The TJ's decision was unanimous, made on June 5, and announced a week ago. Mega-Sena flying ticket Loterias Millena Sartori/g1 VIDEOS: most watched from g1 SC in the last 7 days