Lawyer uses 'so-and-so' and 'so-and-so' in petition Reproduction/TJ The Court of Justice of Santa Catarina (TJSC) denied the appeal of a lawyer who, in addition to asking for the acquittal of a client using supposed non-existent jurisprudence, treated judges as "so-and-so" and "so-and-so" in a petition. The decision is due July 28th. The State Public Ministry (MPSC) also commented on the case in the process and requested that the conduct be investigated by the Brazilian Bar Association (OAB) (read more below). ?Click and follow the g1 SC channel on WhatsApp Lawyer Almir Rogerio Silva represents a man accused of causing a traffic accident with the death of a motorcyclist and an injured passenger. The case took place at SC-406, in Florianópolis, on June 2, 2026. According to the complaint, the person being investigated was under the influence of alcohol. When contacted, the lawyer responsible for the petition classified the fact as a technical error with the absence of a deeper review of the jurisprudence used and that the situation was corrected. In a note, the OAB of Santa Catarina said that it has not yet made an official decision on the case, but as soon as it receives the communication it will adopt measures, ensuring full defense and contradiction on the part of the defender (in full at the end of the text). MP denounces driver of car that crashed head-on into motorcycle for manslaughter MP talks about supposed non-existent jurisprudence The Public Prosecutor's Office pointed out that, in a request made on July 16, the accused's lawyer had used arguments based on "quicksand" to ask for the case to be closed, as the jurisprudence presented was said to have been "created through artificial intelligence". When asking the OAB to investigate the lawyer's conduct for presenting a petition with fictitious jurisprudence, the 16th Public Prosecutor's Office of the Capital added: "Such a situation, certainly, shames the honorable institution of which the Prosecutor is part, damaging the credibility of the hard work carried out by so many other serious lawyers committed to their causes." Occurrence in which the lawyer's request was refused Process The lawyer's client was arrested in the act and was detained for around two weeks, being released on June 16 to be released. In the same decision that ordered the OAB to investigate the conduct, the Court scheduled the hearing and trial of the case for March 16, 2027. What the OAB said In the same way that it acts firmly in defense of the prerogatives of the legal profession, which ensure the full defense of the citizens represented, the OAB/SC closely monitors professional activity in the State. And it applies the same rigor in investigating and handling cases that may reflect ethical or disciplinary infractions related to the practice of law. The Section has not yet been made official in this case. As soon as there is communication, the appropriate measures will be adopted within the institution, in strict compliance with the Law Firm Statute, the Code of Ethics and Discipline and due legal process, ensuring full defense and contradictory proceedings. The OAB/SC also reinforces the defense of free professional practice, based on ethics and principles that guide the activity and, when necessary, acts with disciplinary mechanisms. In the last five years, for example, 557 suspension sentences were imposed and 69 lawyers were excluded from their staff. We believe that law should be an example for society. VIDEOS: most watched g1 SC in the last 7 days