Man will have to share half of Mega-Sena's millionaire prize with ex in SC The ex-partner's speeches and attitudes helped a resident of Blumenau, in Vale do Itajaí, to prove that she had a verbal agreement with him to share the prize of more than R$2.7 million that the two won together in Mega-Sena. Among the evidence that the Santa Catarina Court considered is a print of a conversation via messaging app in which she collects part of the prize. The man does not deny the joint bet and just asks his ex to “calm down”. The decision also considered a transfer of R$200,000 made by him before he was even named in the process (see below). ?Click and follow the g1 SC channel on WhatsApp How a woman proved she had a verbal agreement to share a million-dollar prize with her ex ? The total value of the prize pool was R$ 117.5 million, divided between 42 shares. The former couple was entitled to a share, worth R$2,788,982.62. The state Court of Justice (TJSC) ordered the man to pay R$1,294,491.32 to his ex, which was the amount requested by her in the initial action. According to the lawsuit, the two were in a relationship for about three years. After the draw, however, the man began to move away from the woman. g1 contacted the defendant's defense and had not received a response until the last update of this report. In the process, he has already filed an appeal. What attitudes did the ex take to help prove agreement? In his vote, the reporting judge, Mauro Ferradin, cited one of the pieces of evidence presented by the woman's defense: a conversation via messaging app in which she charged the man for part of the prize. "When are you going to give me my share of the money from the Mega-Sena jackpot that we won together? You know I gave you the money to play together", says an excerpt from one of the messages. It caught the judge's attention that he did not deny that he had made the joint bet. The defendant simply asked his ex-partner to “calm down” (see image below). Messaging application conversation used as proof of the Mega-Sena prize division process in Blumenau, SC Reproduction Another conversation sent to the process as evidence, and which was cited in the rapporteur's vote, lasted around five minutes. In it, the man and the woman argue about the value of the prize. "In this recording, the defendant, although he does not expressly recognize that the author participated in the winning bet, states that he is not denying anything, asks her to be more confident, assures that she would not cheat him and justifies the delay in the transfer under the argument that the money would be invested", wrote the judge rapporteur in the vote. Finally, the decision also considered the fact that the defendant gave the woman an amount of R$200,000 and an apartment. Lawyer Katlen Germano, who is defending her, explained that, when this was done, the case had already been opened, but the man had not yet been named. For the judge, this attitude of the defendant reinforces the thesis that they had a verbal agreement when placing the bets. The TJ's decision was unanimous, made on June 5, and announced a week ago. VIDEOS: most watched g1 SC in the last 7 days