Investigator suspected of involvement in robberies turns herself in to the police. Reproduction/Social Media Amazonas Civil Police investigator Viviane Monteiro de Almeida and three other defendants were convicted by the courts for the crimes of major theft, major extortion and use of a false document. The sentence, signed by judge Patrícia Macedo de Campos, from the 8th Criminal Court of the District of Manaus, concluded that the group posed as civil police officers to enter a victim's home, force her to make bank transfers and steal property from the property. The investigation began after a complaint made by a victim who had his house broken into and R$15,000 stolen by the police officer's criminal group on August 15 last year in Manaus. During the action, the group stole R$5,000 in cash, made a transfer of R$10,000 via the victim's own cell phone and also took a notebook, a watch and other belongings, claiming to have complied with a court order. According to the decision, it was found that there was no order issued against the victim. ? Join the g1 AM channel on WhatsApp Samuel da Costa Matos, Jefferson Cavalcante Marcolino and Alessandro Freire Naranjo were also convicted. According to the process, the accused used tactical vests, badges, handcuffs and a document presented as a search and seizure warrant to convince the victim to allow them to enter the residence. Civil Police investigator is approached in a car suspected of involvement in crimes All of the accused were sentenced to the closed regime. Viviane received the longest sentence among the defendants, being sentenced to 23 years. See all the sentences below: Viviane Monteiro de Almeida: 23 years, 2 months and 13 days; Samuel da Costa Matos: 19 years, 10 months and 20 days; Alessandro Freire Naranjo: 16 years, 6 months and 27 days; Jefferson Cavalcante Marcolino: 16, 6 months and 27 days. g1 tries to contact the defense of all those mentioned. The judge stated that the set of evidence produced during the investigation demonstrated the participation of the four defendants in the criminal action. The decision cites the report on the extraction of telematic data from the investigator's cell phone, messages exchanged between the accused, bank statements, images from security cameras, in addition to the objects seized during the investigation. According to the sentence, conversations extracted from the cell phone show references to planning the approach, monitoring the victim, dividing the amounts obtained through extortion and the use of the bank account that received the Pixs. In relation to the crime of using a false document, the judge concluded that the document presented during the approach was used to give the appearance of legality to the action and facilitate the defendants' entry into the victim's residence. The charge of criminal association was rejected. For the judge, the evidence did not demonstrate stability, permanence or organized structure between the accused, requirements required by law for the definition of this crime.