Mayor said in the veto that the decision is contrary to the collective interest Aperibé Urgente The mayor of Aperibé, in the Northwest of Fluminense, Ronald de Cássio Daibes Moreira, fully vetoed Bill No. 23/2026, which provided for the granting of food assistance in the amount of R$1,000 per month to the municipality's councilors. With the mayor's veto, the text returns to the Chamber where it will be analyzed by councilors in plenary, who will be responsible for deciding whether to maintain the Executive's decision or overturn the veto. The Aperibé Chamber is made up of nine councilors. If the project comes into force, the expense with the new benefit will be R$9,000 per month, which represents an expenditure of R$108,000 per year with public resources. ? Follow the g1 Norte Fluminense channel on WhatsApp.
Mayor of Aperibé vetoes R$1,000 food aid proposal for councilors
Mayor said in the veto that the decision is contrary to the collective interest Aperibé Urgente The mayor of Aperibé, in the Northwest of Fluminense, Ronald de Cássio Daibes Moreira, fully vetoed Bill No. 23/2026, which...
Understand the story quickly
With the mayor's veto, the text returns to the Chamber where it will be analyzed by councilors in plenary, who will be responsible for deciding whether to maintain the Executive's decision or overturn the veto. The Aperibé Chamber is made up of nine councilors.
Key points
- If the project comes into force, the expense with the new benefit will be R$9,000 per month, which represents an expenditure of R$108,000 per year with public resources.
- Follow the g1 Norte Fluminense channel on WhatsApp.
Publication context
This story is part of the States coverage. The report is associated with Norte Fluminense. The source identified for the original reporting is G1. Published on August 21, 2026 at 10:18.
Editorial summary prepared by 365 Breaking News from the information attributed on this page to G1.
In the document sent to the Chamber, the mayor argues that the use of funds from the Legislature for councilors' individual consumption expenses reduces the Chamber's own capacity to make structural investments or return any financial surpluses to the municipal coffers. At the conclusion of the veto, Ronald de Cássio states that he took into consideration what he classified as a “manifest public outcry” and “evident contradiction to the collective interest” to decide on a full veto of the project. The proposal had been approved by the City Council by 7 votes to 2. The mayor, Pedro Paulo, and councilor Vinícius Curty voted against the project.
This editorial update is based on information published by G1. The source link is provided for transparency and verification.
Open original publication