Movement in commerce in the Center of Manaus. Amazon Network Household Consumption Intention (ICF) in Amazonas rose 0.6% in August and reached 128.9 points, according to the National Confederation of Commerce in Goods, Services and Tourism (CNC). The index remains above 100 points, a level considered satisfaction, and registers the second consecutive month of increase. In comparison with August 2025, growth was 9.2%, with all components in positive territory. The advance was driven by Access to Credit (+6.6%) and the Consumer Outlook (+4.6%). Current Income fell by 1.4% and the Time to Purchase Durables fell by 2.8%, showing greater caution among families with their income and the purchase of higher-value goods. The Consumption Outlook also improved: it grew 0.8% compared to August 2025, reversing the 3.5% drop recorded in July. The result shows greater confidence among families in Amazonas for the coming months, different from the national scenario, where there was a 0.2% decline in August after four consecutive increases. ? Join the g1 AM channel on WhatsApp Job market The job market helped to sustain confidence. Current Employment rose 1.2% in August and has accumulated an increase of 11.8% in one year. Data from the General Register of Employed and Unemployed Persons (Caged) indicate that Amazonas registered 12,377 new hires in the first half of the year, growth of 2.2%. In Brazil, the increase was 2.0%.
Consumption intention in Amazonas rises for the 2nd month in a row and reaches 128.9 points
Movement in commerce in the Center of Manaus. Amazon Network Household Consumption Intention (ICF) in Amazonas rose 0.6% in August and reached 128.9 points, according to the National Confederation of Commerce in Goods, Services and Tourism...
In comparison with August 2025, growth was 9.2%, with all components in positive territory. The advance was driven by Access to Credit (+6.6%) and the Consumer Outlook (+4.6%).
- Current Income fell by 1.4% and the Time to Purchase Durables fell by 2.8%, showing greater caution among families with their income and the purchase of higher-value goods.
- The Consumption Outlook also improved: it grew 0.8% compared to August 2025, reversing the 3.5% drop recorded in July.
Editorial reading aid based only on information contained in this story and its identified source.
Even with advances, there is caution about the professional future. The Professional Outlook fell 0.9% in August, the second consecutive drop. Even so, in the annual comparison, the indicator grew 11.4%, showing that the perception remains better than a year ago. Current Income is also a concern. After rising 0.5% in July, it fell 1.4% in August. In the annual comparison, it remains positive, with an increase of 5%, but at a slower pace than in July (+6.9%). The Moment for Purchasing Durables had the biggest drop, of 2.8%, and has accumulated three months of decline. Even so, it is 21.3% above the August 2025 level, indicating that, despite recent caution, conditions for this type of purchase remain more favorable than a year ago. Credit Among families earning up to ten minimum wages, the ICF grew 9.2% in one year. Among those earning more than ten minimum wages, the increase was 9.6%. Despite being close, the variations had different compositions. The highest-income families saw an increase of 14.5% in the Professional Perspective and 22.2% in the Consumer Perspective. Among those with lower income, the highlight was the Durable Purchase Time, with an increase of 25%, showing the weight of credit for this group. In the monthly variation, both groups registered improvement. Among those with higher incomes, the increase was 0.9% after two months of decline. Those with lower incomes grew by 0.5%, the second increase in a row. In lower-income families, the highlights were Access to Credit (+7%) and Consumption Perspective (+2.8%). On the other hand, Current Income fell 1.5% and Timing to Purchase Durables fell 3.3%. Among lower-income families, credit remains the main factor supporting consumption intentions. Those with higher income are less dependent on this variable. The difference appears in the purchase of durable goods: it fell 3.3% among the poorest, but increased 1.2% among the richest.