24-hour coverage PT
Breaking News Brazil and the world, minute by minute
Movies

Mad Rush review – an intricate phone scam isn’t quite enough to drive this very Melbourne movie

In Hollywood’s hands this would be a pulse-pounding thriller, but Maddelin McKenna’s lithe feature debut is all about street-level authenticity There are few films that feel as quintessentially “Melbourne” as Mad Rush, the feature debut of...

Mad Rush review – an intricate phone scam isn’t quite enough to drive this very Melbourne movie
365 Summary

McKenna brings a grainy street-level authenticity to a story centred on gen Z protagonist Madisha (Senuri Chandrani), who is targeted by an intricate phone scam involving callers who claim to work for the Australian tax office and insist she withdraw all cash from her bank account. In Hollywood’s hands this premise would probably become a pulse-pounding...

  • Here, it more closely follows the beats of a far more realistic “day in the life of” narrative.
  • Its small conversation-based moments are convincingly staged, but don’t do much to service the plot or propel things forward, although the pacing remains quite tight across the run time’s...

Editorial reading aid based only on information contained in this story and its identified source.

In Hollywood’s hands this would be a pulse-pounding thriller, but Maddelin McKenna’s lithe feature debut is all about street-level authenticity

There are few films that feel as quintessentially “Melbourne” as Mad Rush, the feature debut of writer-director Maddelin McKenna. It largely unfolds in the city’s centre, with a scaled-back colour palette – lots of blues and greys – that seems informed by the city itself. McKenna brings a grainy street-level authenticity to a story centred on gen Z protagonist Madisha (Senuri Chandrani), who is targeted by an intricate phone scam involving callers who claim to work for the Australian tax office and insist she withdraw all cash from her bank account.

In Hollywood’s hands this premise would probably become a pulse-pounding thriller. Here, it more closely follows the beats of a far more realistic “day in the life of” narrative. Its small conversation-based moments are convincingly staged, but don’t do much to service the plot or propel things forward, although the pacing remains quite tight across the run time’s lithe 76 minutes.